Wednesday, September 24, 2008

How Obama Applies Alinsky's Rules

A number of people have passed this Investor's Business Daily editorial on to me. I believe it's worth sharing. Find the entire text and a lot more online here:

How Obama Applies Alinsky's Rules

Election '08: Barack Obama's mocking of John McCain, while urging his followers to "get in their face," are tactics right out of his radical hero Saul Alinsky's playbook: ridicule and agitation.

At a recent Las Vegas rally, Obama poked fun at Sen. McCain for what he described as bragging about "how as chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, he had oversight of every part of the economy."

"Well, all I can say to Sen. McCain is, 'Nice job. Nice job,' " Obama said in a sarcastic tone. "Where is he getting these lines? It's like a 'Saturday Night Live' routine."

Then he belittled the 72-year-old McCain for vowing to take on the old boys network. "In the McCain campaign, that's called a staff meeting," he sneered.

The late Alinsky, a trench-warfare socialist who despised American capitalism, advised community organizers like Obama to "laugh at the enemy" to provoke "irrational anger."

"Ridicule," he said, "is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage."

At another rally in Nevada, Obama called on the crowd of about 1,500 to join him in sharpening their elbows against McCain and his supporters. "I want you argue with them and get in their face," he said, in a naked attempt to "fan hostilities" in the tightening race, something Alinsky also advised from his bag of agitation tricks.

Obama doesn't look or talk like an angry radical. He speaks in measured tones and is rarely seen out of business attire. That, too, is borrowed from Alinsky's playbook. "Don't scare" the middle class, he guides urban revolutionaries in his 1970s manual, "Rules for Radicals" (which he dedicated to mankind's "first radical, Lucifer").

Instead, look like them, talk like them, act like them.

And work for radical change from the inside — "like a spy behind enemy lines," as Obama said in his first memoir. He wrote it before entering politics, while still working with hard-left Alinsky groups and training street agitators known as "community organizers."

As he wrote, he became a community organizer in 1983 because of "The need for change. Change in the White House, where Reagan and his minions were carrying on their dirty deeds."

That's when he set out to "organize black folks" for social revolution, first in Harlem, then the South Side of Chicago. Now he wants to do it on a "large scale." Though most average voters wouldn't know it, he's applying Alinsky's radical rules to achieve his goal.

Alinksy stressed that his rules be translated into real-life tactics responsive to the situation at hand — which right now happens to be something he never could have dreamed of: a disciple who would find himself in a viable battle for the most powerful job in the world.

Obama has already translated several of Alinsky's rules into battle tactics, including:

• Rule: "Rub raw the resentments of the people; search out controversy and issues." In the mortgage meltdown, for instance, Obama vows to prosecute "predatory lenders" for "abusing" minority borrowers. He's also stoking class resentment by painting Wall Street and other executives as villains.

• Rule: "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it." In an ad to woo Hispanic voters, Obama demonized Rush Limbaugh by falsely claiming he made racist statements against immigrants.

• Rule: "A mass impression can be lasting and intimidating." This explains why Obama moved his acceptance speech to a football stadium and bussed in 85,000 supporters. Alinsky's son was so impressed, he praised Obama for learning his father's "lesson well."

• Rule: "Multiple issues mean constant action and life" for the cause. This is why Obama never harps on one issue, as Hillary did with health care. His platform is packed with grievances from "economic justice" to "reproductive justice" to "environmental justice."

Obama is following almost to the letter the blueprint for socialist revolution drafted by the father of community organizing.

While Alinsky may help him behind the scenes, however, he becomes a liability when brought out of the shadows. Sarah Palin proved this in St. Paul when she ridiculed his community organizing. Within hours, Obama surrogates whined about how just bringing up the phrase was racist code for "black."

No, it's code for communist. And McCain should make that point instead of legitimizing such radicalism, as he did recently when he said, "I respect community organizers; and Sen. Obama's record there is outstanding" — which contradicted his running mate.

There's nothing to respect about such anti-American radicals, even if they have traded their tie-dye for business ties.

RULES FOR RADICALS has become the guidebook for left-wing organizations such as the ACLU, NEA and other labor unions, environmentalist groups and the Democrat Party. Here is his list of the 13 "power tactics" necessary to manipulate the public to adopt a radical's goal, whatever it may be:
(1) Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.
(2) Never go outside the experience of your people.
(3) Whenever possible, go outside of the experience of the enemy.
(4) Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
(5) Ridicule is man's most potent weapon.
(6) A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.
(7) A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
(8) Keep the pressure on with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purposes.
(9) The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
(10) The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
(11) If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside.
(12) The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.
(13) Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.

For excerpts from Alinsky's book, Rules for Radicals and more, click here:

Saturday, September 06, 2008

Some Thoughts On Sarah Palin

Although I'm a registered Democrat, I view myself as a "Radical Centrist" and proudly vote as an independent. I make no apologies for supporting the best and most qualified candidates for any particular office. That's why I strongly support Dino Rossi for governor. Considering the complete and total mess Christine Gregoire has made of our state — including blowing a $2.5 billion surplus and turning it into a $2.7 billion deficit — not to mention letting the unions and tribes run amok, how any thinking person could support her just totally escapes me. As the person cleaning up the mess Kim Abel left in Port Orchard, I support Jan Angel for the 26th District House, for the very same reason.

The bottom line for me is not about partisan politics. It's about competence.

Which brings us to why, although I originally was an early supporter of Barack Obama, I'll be voting for John McCain and Sarah Palin. The liberal mainstream media (MSM), coupled with the Democratic Party (a branch of the MSM — or is it the other way around?), had a field day vilifying McCain for choosing Palin, carping about his "lack of judgment" for selecting someone so "inexperienced." Yet they continually fail to mention that Barack Obama has exactly 143 days of Senate experience — and absolutely none balancing a budget or running any kind of government organization. They also conveniently neglect to mention Obama has zero foreign policy experience, and that his VP is suspect at best in that realm as well.

Considering how Palin has successfully run both a city and a state government, she actually has MORE "experience" in dealing with the actual nuts and bolts of government than either Obama or Joe Biden. Meanwhile, the Democrats whine about her hairstyle, the fact she wore a skirt when she gave that killer speech at the convention, her pregnant, unmarried daughter, and what a bad decision she made to have a Down Syndrome baby rather than abort it.


When that didn't work, things took a more vicious turn, as rumors began circulating that she had an affair, that she cut funding for special needs kids, that she insisted books be banned from Alaska libraries, and worse. And then there's that whole red herring "Bridge to Nowhere" issue. None of that has worked either. Go figure.

But my question is this: Could Sarah Palin actually be the next Ronald Reagan? I think that possibility scares the crap out of the Democrats more than any other single thing about her. Palin immediately connected with voters in much the same way Reagan did. She is an everyday Mom and voters identify with her — perhaps the same way they identified with a certain "Mom in tennis shoes." She believes in Reagan's ideals, and she has the courage of her convictions. Palin has the charisma of both Reagan and Bill Clinton, combined with the toughness of Harry Truman and/or Dick Cheney, and is much more likable — not to mention feminine — than Hillary. In the South where I grew up, she's what we call a "Steel Magnolia."

This should have been the Democrats' year. But in my view they've made two critical mistakes.

• NOT nominating Hillary for President.

• NOT nominating Hillary for Vice President.

The Democrats could be kicking themselves for the next decade or longer, after the possibility of at least one McCain-Palin term, and possibly two, followed by two Palin-Jindall or Palin-Pawlenty terms.

Obama was a MSM-driven juggernaut until his insecurities began surfacing when he chose marginally effective Washington insider Joe Biden as his VP, instead of boldly stepping up to select Hillary. That, coupled with his treatment of Palin in the days since her selection, has clearly demonstrated a major weakness in Obama's confidence — a weakness that hasn't escaped American voters. And Americans have no patience for weakness in their leaders — as witnessed by Obama's declining poll numbers.

Conversely, McCain chose Palin not to steal Obama's thunder by the timing of the announcement (which it clearly did) but because he believes
she can lead.

Palin has already demonstrated courage, strength, and grace under pressure. One example the MSM won't report because it illustrates just how strong, smart, and quick on her feet she is, is that during her kick-ass speech at the convention, the teleprompter went blank less than halfway through it. Palin didn't even blink, much less stumble. She winged it — with stunning results.

What I find extremely ironic about all this, is that by becoming the first woman vice president in America's history, Sarah Palin will be the one to shatter the glass ceiling. It almost makes you feel sorry for Hillary. Almost...

Wednesday, September 03, 2008

Matthes Resigns as VP of KAPO

Tim Matthes, a candidate for County Commissioner from South Kitsap, has resigned as vice president of the Kitsap Alliance of Property Owners, (KAPO) so he can focus all his energies on getting elected. Matthes was the top vote-getter in the Aug. 19 primary, and will face former commissioner Charlotte Garrido in the Nov. 4 general election. Both are attempting to capture the seat being vacated by Jan Angel, who is running for the state House of Representatives from the 26th District.

In a prepared statement, Matthes stated, “I’m clearing the decks so I can do the best job possible as a candidate. My schedule has gotten very busy, and I have to give my campaign my full attention.”

KAPO has been a lightening rod for controversy in the area of local land-use issues, and is known for its strong support of property rights. It challenged Kitsap County in court over the Critical Areas Ordinance (CAO), and while losing in Superior Court, a recent Washington State Supreme Court decision has upheld its position while ruling on King County's CAO. While Matthes resigned his KAPO office, he will remain a member.

Matthes is also a member of the Kitsap County Board of Equalization, which hears challenges to the assessed value of local property. He has requested that his alternate take over that responsibility until the election is decided. Matthes said he would resign if elected because of the obvious conflict of interest.

He is also a member of the City of Port Orchard Planning Commission, and will continue to serve in that capacity until the election is over. If he wins, he will resign, and if not, he'll remain a member of the Commission.

Saturday, August 30, 2008

Ethical Democrats

With the election campaign now in full swing, the Democrats suddenly have seemed to develop a very keen sense of morality.

So much so that John Edwards was banned from making a speech at the Democratic National Convention after admitting he had an affair, and then lied about it.

Bill Clinton spoke in his place.

Britney’s Set Designer Built Obama’s Stage

This was reported by UPI and published in the New York Post...

The same set team that designed Britney Spear’s last tour constructed the enormous, Greek columned stage where Barack Obama officially accepted the Democratic Presidential nomination, According to the New York Post. The set, which was reportedly designed to resemble the White House and Lincoln Memorial, was built inside Invesco Field at Mile High in Denver under the direction of Bobby Allen, Spears’ former staging manager.

The elaborate set design prompted ridicule from the McCain campaign and other Republicans, who mocked its ornate layout. The McCain campaign was quick to release a memo calling it the "Temple of Obama" and the Republican National Committee dubbed it "Barackopolis."

"It’s only appropriate that Barack Obama would descend down from the heavens and spend a little time with us mere mortals when accepting the Democratic nomination," RNC spokesman Danny Diaz told The Post. But Spears’ stage manager defended his design, telling the paper it in no way represents the Acropolis. We’ve done Britney’s sets and a whole bunch of rock shows, but this was far more elaborate and complicated," Allen said.

Friday, August 22, 2008

Money Can't Buy You Love, Fred...

Here is an interesting bit of information from the 35th District race, sent to me by Daimon Doyle…

Out of all 304 candidates vying for a legislative seat — both House and Senate — Democrat Fred Finn, who is seeking the 35th District House seat vacated by the retirement of Democrat Bill Eickmeyer, ranked eighth in fundraising among all House candidates, and 16th overall.

In terms of spending however he ranked second only to Joseph James in the 17th (Clark County) who was trying to hold on to Republican control of the district and running against incumbent Jim Dunn. James raised about $4,000 less than Finn but spent $4,000 more.

To have spent more than 302 candidates, many of whom were in much more hotly contested raises and yet barely come out ahead of his Republican opponent — Randy Neatherlin — who raised five times less money, is at the very least an embarrassment. And in a district with a vacant Democratic seat that traditionally votes 60 percent Democratic, some might consider that a major upset.

Incidentally, it is rumored that Finn spent most of his money in Kitsap County, and is still losing to Neatherlin by nearly three points. I guess money can’t buy you love, Fred — or votes.

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Time For A Reality Check Christine

I was shocked to see Governor Christine Gregoire flat out state on KING 5's Up Front program, that not only does the state not have a budget deficit, but that it actually has a surplus of $800 million. What's more, she said it with a completely straight face!

Never mind the fact challenger Dino Rossi has been warning us for well over a year that we will be drowning in red ink by election day in November, predicting a deficit of around $2.5 billion, Gregoire’s own Office of Financial Management (OFM) now has the number pegged at about $2.7 billion — and growing.

There is an $800 million dollar Rainy Day Fund, that Gregoire insisted the legislature squirrel away — over the strenuous objections of both the special interests funding her re-election campaign, and legislators on the type of spending binge usually attributed to drunken sailors. But still, that’s a far cry from any kind of a surplus. No wonder Gregoire delayed the math portion of the WASL. Obviously she doesn’t understand math any better than those high school kids.

So here it is Governor…

$2.7 billion minus $800 million equals $1.9 billion. That means if we allocated the entire Rainy Day Fund to reducing the deficit, we’d still be $1.9 billion in the hole.

To their credit, moderators KING 5 news anchor Lori Matsukawa, and Seattle Times political columnist David Postman attempted to force Gregoire to address the budget in a truthful manner, but the Governor completely ignored their questions, rudely talking right over them and launching into a vitriolic attack on Rossi, that mirrored the blatant lies being told in her TV commercials.

I don’t know if Gregoire is trying to pass off the “Big Lie” about the deficit hoping against hope that the voters are really that stupid, or if she’s completely out of touch with reality. Either way, the bottom line is that we have a serious spending problem on our hands that neither ignoring it — nor lying about it to voters — is going to solve

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

An Interview With Rossi

In perusing the Internet, I came across a link to a site I'd never visited before called Red County, that has an interesting interview with Dino Rossi. You can find it here.

Of note, was one particular quote... "This election is not about me, it's not about Christine Gregoire; it's about changing the culture and direction of state government for a generation."

Regular readers of my Business Journal column and this space, know I've said for quite some time that if we're not happy with what passes for leadership in Olympia, that we aren't going to able to change the balance of power in the legislature, but it is possible to change one position that can and will make a difference — the Governor.

Thursday, August 07, 2008

Gregoire's Double-Edged Sword

Talk about being caught on the bleeding edge...

In this video, Barrak Obama's words have the unintended consequence of indicting Christine Gregoire without saying anything else about her. It looks like the Rossi camp was handed a gift. Notice Gregoire nodding her head in agreement.

Powerful stuff...

Sunday, August 03, 2008

Kitsap Sun Endorsement Commentary

I laughed out loud reading the online comments on the Kitsap Sun's editorial endorsements of Fred Finn and Kathy Haigh for the 35th District House seats. I couldn't have agreed more with the commentary from readers about how completely out of touch the Sun's editorial board is with mainstream Kitsap voters.

For starters, it appears the editorial board thinks that people who don't live within 50 miles of us somehow have our best interests at heart. Hello??? Their choices, Fred Finn and incumbent Kathy Haigh, live in Olympia and in Shelton respectively. Those areas have exactly what in common with Kitsap?

The Sun's editorial board's choices exactly mirror the preferences of the Democratic Party. Gee. what a surprise.

In the race for retiring Bill Eickmeyer's seat, there are two Democrats and two Republicans running. The Sun's choice is Democrat Fred Finn. While on the surface, Finn appears to have a lot of qualifications, his main advantage seems to be having had the 35th District's unofficial Den Mother, Fran Moyer (Jay Inslee's retired local laison), shepherding him around to appear anywhere and everywhere, for most of the last year.

Finn may be a nice fellow, however, he's anything but dynamic. In one endorsement interview I participated in, when asked about the looming $2.7 billion state budget deficit, he went off on a tangent about world economics and hunger. When asked specifically if he'd be willing to vote against his party's special interests and make hard choices about the state budget, he ignored the question, and returned to pontificating about his world view — which has nothing to do with solving our spending problems in Olympia.

Daryl Daugs is a much better Democratic candidate. He's personable, knowledgable, polished, quick on his feet, and has a wide variety of experience. He seems unafraid to reach across the aisle and buck the party's special interests on spending issues. And even in spite of his union background, Daugs seems pragmatic enough to understand that business and labor need to be partners — not adversaries — in an economy like this one.

On the Republican side, it's Herb Baze against Randy Neatherlin.

Baze is boring, uninformed, and in an endorsement interview I was a part of, he was completely unprepared to answer even the most basic of questions. He's also about as dynamic as Finn when it comes to communicating whatever ideas and beliefs he may have to the voters. He is clearly the wrong choice for both the GOP and for the 35th.

I'll admit, when I first met Randy Neatherlin a few years ago, I didn't care much for him. But as I got to know him, I learned he is the real deal. In my mind he is the best choice of this entire bunch. Neatherlin is a successful businessman, community activist, and a dynamic speaker whose passion for the issues, for helping people, and for always doing the right thing, is worn on his sleeve like a badge of honor. What you see is what you get.

Neatherlin angered lot of the greenie crowd when he moved to block the sale of some Theler Center property in Belfair a couple of years ago. I'll confess to not knowing all the details of this, but my basic understanding is that the property in question was in some kind of trust, and that somehow the salmon center there was going to benefit financially from the sale. The problem was, it was going to be sold at well below market value. Neatherlin filed suit to block the sale, unless the buyer agreed to pay appraised value.

This didn't endear him to the local Democrats who support the salmon center heavily. But to Neatherlin, the bottom line was that the Theler property was a pubic asset that was going to have a great deal of its value basically gifted away — even if it was for a good cause — and gifting public property is not only illegal, but flat out wrong. The courts upheld Neatherlin's position and the sale was stopped. But that's just how Neatherlin is, and it's that passion for always doing what's right that makes him far and away the best choice in this race.

In the other race, it's Democratic incumbent Kathy Haigh, an unabashed liberal, versus Republicans "Blue Collar" Brad Gehring and Marco Brown.

It's time for Haigh to return to her veterinary practice full time. She hasn't done squat for Kitsap County in the several terms she's been in the House and always blindly votes the party line on spending and supporting all the usual powerful, Democratic special interests — unions, environmentalists, etc.

Brown, who is making his second run against Haigh, is a non-factor in this race — except perhaps as a spoiler. He refused to be interviewed by the Sun, didn't appear at endorsement interviews for several organizations I'm aware of, and generally doesn't return phone calls. In spite of all this, he says he's actually taking this race lot more seriously than he did the first time. Go figure.

Gehring is an incumbent Bremerton City Councilman. I serve on a couple of boards with him, and have generally found him to be pretty thoughtful and pragmatic. While we don't always agree (SKIA for example) he's courteous, listens, and honestly tries to make the best decisions on the part of the taxpayers. He's also from here — something that should have given him the nod from the Sun's editorial board if they had their collective head in the proper place instead of marching to the tune called by the Democratic Party — which they clearly appear to be.

The best races for the taxpayers in my view, would be Neatherlin vs. Daugs, and Haigh vs. Gehring.